Honor MagicPad 2 平板电脑评测--12.3 英寸、144 赫兹 OLED 价格杀手令人印象深刻。 对于平板电脑来说，600 英镑是个不小的数字。然而，纤薄的Honor MagicPad 2 却能给你带来丰厚的回报：它是配备 OLED 显示屏的最经济实惠的 12 英寸平板电脑之一。144 Hz 的刷新率、3K 分辨率、8 个扬声器和速度极快的 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 使其规格表堪称一流。但它的实际表现如何呢？我们在评测中进行了仔细观察。 Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 10/02/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
🇫🇷 🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇮🇹 🇳🇱 🇸🇪 🇹🇷 🇵🇱 🇭🇺 🇷🇺 Android Tablet Touchscreen
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types
到目前为止，MagicPad 2 只在中国有售。现在，Honor ，这款 12.3 英寸平板电脑的欧洲版已经面世，而且价格诱人。
在英国，MagicPad 2 的售价为 450 英镑。当然，这仍然是一大笔钱。但 MagicPad 2 实际上是配备 OLED 屏幕的最实惠的 12.x 英寸平板电脑之一。它还具有 144 Hz 的刷新率和 3K 分辨率（3000 x 1920 像素）。据Honor 报道，该显示屏的亮度高达 1600 尼特。
MagicPad 2 采用
骁龙 8s 第 3 代处理器和 12GB RAM，可以确保良好的性能。总体而言，这些参数使这款平板电脑跻身同类产品的前列，并接近强劲的竞争对手，如 Apple iPad Pro 12.9.与此同时，Apple 平板电脑的分辨率较低，并且只能达到 120 Hz。而且价格是它的两倍。
Test device courtesy of Honor
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
Honor MagicPad 2 (MagicPad Series)ProcessorQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 8 x 2 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A720 / A520 (Kryo)Graphics adapterQualcomm Adreno 735Memory12 GB Display12.30 inch 16:10, 3000 x 1920 pixel 290 PPI, capacitive, native pen support, OLED, 1.07 billion colors, 4320 Hz PWM dimming, Dynamic Dimming, brightness up to 1600 Nits, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 HzStorage256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB , 227 GB freeConnections1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Gravity Sensor, Camera2 API Level 3, 66W max. charging speedNetworking802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3Sizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 5.8 x 274.5 x 180.5Battery10050 mAh Lithium-IonChargingfast charging / QuickchargeOperating SystemAndroid 14CameraPrimary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.0, AF, video recording up to 4K@30fps)Secondary Camera: 9 MPix (f/2.2, video recording up to 4K@30fps)Additional featuresSpeakers: 8 speakers with IMAX Enhanced and Hi-Res Audio Certification, Keyboard: virtual, 66W charger (11V/6A), USB-C cable, quick start guide, warranty card, MagicOS 8.0, 24 Months Warranty, fanlessWeight555 g, Power Supply: 105 g
Price600 EuroNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
潜在的竞争对手比较
RatingVersionDateModelWeightHeightSizeResolutionPrice
84.8 %v810 / 2024Honor MagicPad 2SD 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735555 g5.8 mm12.30"3000x1920
91.8 %v7 (old)v7 (old)11 / 2022Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022M2, M2 10-Core GPU682 g6.4 mm12.90"2732x2048
74.8 %v806 / 2024Lenovo Tab P12 PaperDimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4615 g6.9 mm12.70"2944x1840
91.3 %v7 (old)v7 (old)10 / 2023Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740586 g5.7 mm12.40"2800x1752
89.3 %v7 (old)v7 (old)05 / 2024Xiaomi Pad 6S ProSD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740590 g6.26 mm12.40"3048x2032
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
请注意：我们更新了评级系统，这意味着第 8 版的结果不能与第 7 版进行比较。了解更多关于此更改的信息 这里.
外壳 - 12.3 英寸平板电脑，轻薄小巧 尽管 MagicPad 2 体积庞大，但它采用了非常纤薄的一体式机身外壳，555 克的重量让用户可以轻松地单手长时间握持平板电脑而不会感到疲倦。12.3 英寸平板电脑的厚度仅为 5.8 毫米，同样非常纤薄。你可能会注意到，平板电脑并不能完全平放在坚硬的表面上，这是因为后置摄像头模块突出机身约一毫米。
5 毫米的窄边框由铝硅酸盐玻璃制成，进一步凸显了纤薄的外观。平板电脑给人的整体印象很好，尽管磨砂后盖是由塑料制成，而不是像其他边框一样由铝制成。缝隙尺寸紧凑均匀，平板电脑在我们尝试翘起时也没有变形。不过，该设备没有 IP 防护等级。
除了月光白这一白色版本外，Honor MagicPad 2 还有黑色版本。
尺寸比较
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Honor MagicPad 2 DIN A4 ❌
连接性 - 仅提供 256 GB 存储空间在欧洲，Honor 的 MagicPad 2 只提供一种存储选项。该设备配备 12 GB 内存和 256 GB 存储空间，目前在英国的售价为 500 英镑。由于没有 micoSD 读卡器，该平板电脑的内部存储空间几乎无法扩展。
在中国，这款平板电脑有更多选择，包括高达 16 GB 的内存和 1 TB 的存储容量。但优势也仅限于此：即使是中国版本也不支持 LTE 或 5G，也不支持 NFC。
MagicPad 2 的 USB-C 端口支持 OTG，但速度仅限于 USB 2.0，因此无法实现图像输出。使用三星 980 Pro 固态硬盘，我们测得的传输速率为 25.5 MB/s。由于缺少 3.5 英寸音频接口，USB-C 端口被迫承担起音频接口的角色。平板电脑支持 DRM WideVine L1。
左： 扬声器、USB-C 2.0、扬声器
右：电源按钮、扬声器
顶部：与框架融为一体的磁性插接区，用于安装可选的 Sytlus 系统
底部：麦克风、音量摇杆软件 - MagicPad 2，含Android 14MagicPad 2 运行Android 14 和Honor 自己的用户界面 MagicOS 8.0。制造商选择加入各种人工智能功能，包括 Magic Capsule（Applie 动态岛的副本）、Magic Ring（兼容Honor 设备之间的数据交换）等智能助手以及用于照片的人工智能橡皮擦。您可以在Honor 网站上找到 MagicOS 8 的功能概览。.
遗憾的是，Honor 的Android 更新相当少。包括 Magic Pro 系列在内的其他Honor 设备最多可获得 3 次操作系统更新和 5 年的安全补丁，而 MagicPad 2 只能获得 1 次操作系统升级和 3 年的安全补丁。后者将每季度。.
可持续性Honor MagicPad 2 的包装几乎不使用塑料，但却没有说明包装或平板电脑本身使用了多少可回收材料。制造商也没有提供任何有关该设备碳足迹的信息。最终消费者无法购买 MagicPad 2 的更换部件，但制造商提供维修服务。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Honor 平板电脑，无 GPS 和蜂窝系统MagicPad 2 依靠 WiFi 6，在我们使用参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 进行的测试中，传输速率稳定在 937 MBit/s。这几乎足以充分利用千兆网络连接。(最初发送数据时吞吐量较慢是由于路由器仍在唤醒）。
Honor 平板电脑的 WiFi 传输速率比 Apple iPad Pro 12.9和 联想平板电脑 P12.与 三星Galaxy Tab S9+和 小米 Pad 6S Pro不同的是，它不能使用 6 GHz 频段，这意味着，总体而言，这款平板电脑的 WiFi 性能与其替代产品相比一般。
由于缺少 GPS 模块，MagicPad 2 不提供导航服务。该功能仅在中国提供。我们不知道为什么国际版的平板电脑会取消这一功能。
NetworkingHonor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash iperf3 receive AXE11000
937 (min: 892) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
867 (min: 453) MBit/s ∼91%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe iperf3 receive AXE11000
442 (min: 222) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
486 (min: 175) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
747 (min: 145) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
702 (min: 225) MBit/s ∼49%
Lenovo Tab P12 PaperMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash iperf3 receive AXE11000
673 (min: 516) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
873 (min: 734) MBit/s ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1518 (min: 1344) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1006 (min: 859) MBit/s ∼70%
Xiaomi Pad 6S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash iperf3 receive AXE11000
778 (min: 542) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
953 (min: 870) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1620 (min: 1070) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1437 (min: 1239) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø747 (145-917) Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø694 (225-834) Honor MagicPad 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 735; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø936 (892-952) Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø442 (222-528) Honor MagicPad 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 735; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø852 (453-934) Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø486 (175-591)
照相机--日光下的好照片用自拍相机拍摄的照片MagicPad 2 的自拍摄像头分辨率为 900 万像素，与主摄像头一样，可以录制高达 4K 的视频和每秒 30 张图片。它足以满足视频聊天的需要，但不能显示很多细节，即使在光线良好的情况下也会显得颗粒感很强。
Honor 12.3 英寸平板电脑的背面是一个单摄像头。虽然看起来像是两个镜头，但左边实际上是一个 LED 闪光灯。1300 万像素的主摄像头色彩平衡偏暖，在日光下拍摄的照片效果不错，甚至可以与一般的中端智能手机相媲美。我们在可控光线下进行的色彩分析并未发现任何重大偏差（最大 Delta-E 值为 10.03）。
当拍摄对象距离较远时，动态范围仍然很高，但细节水平明显下降，图像暗部有明显的噪点。主摄像头的变焦能力不佳，文字图片容易模糊。在光线不好的情况下，相机几乎无法使用，因为照片图案几乎完全消失在黑暗中。
主摄像头最大可录制 4K 视频，每秒可拍摄 30 幅图像。效果相当不错。拍摄时无法在主摄像头和自拍摄像头之间切换。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Tageslicht-Aufnahme 1Tageslicht-Aufnahme 2Textdarstellung5-facher ZoomLowlight-Aufnahmeclick to load imagesHonor MagicPad 2Canon EOS 90DSamsung Galaxy S24Nothing Phone (2a)0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesHonor MagicPad 2Canon EOS 90DSamsung Galaxy S24Nothing Phone (2a)0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesHonor MagicPad 2Canon EOS 90DSamsung Galaxy S24Nothing Phone (2a)0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesHonor MagicPad 2Canon EOS 90DSamsung Galaxy S24Nothing Phone (2a)0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesHonor MagicPad 2Canon EOS 90DSamsung Galaxy S24Nothing Phone (2a)0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x
9.1 ∆E7.3 ∆E7.2 ∆E10 ∆E3.6 ∆E4.2 ∆E5.7 ∆E1.8 ∆E6.4 ∆E7.7 ∆E5.4 ∆E4.8 ∆E3.3 ∆E10 ∆E4.1 ∆E7.4 ∆E4.5 ∆E0.5 ∆E8 ∆E5.9 ∆E2.9 ∆E10 ∆E8.7 ∆E4.4 ∆EColorChecker Honor MagicPad 2: 5.96 ∆E min: 0.49 - max: 10.03 ∆E29.1 ∆E54.3 ∆E39.1 ∆E36.3 ∆E44.7 ∆E63.3 ∆E53.8 ∆E35.3 ∆E43.1 ∆E27.4 ∆E65.3 ∆E64.7 ∆E30.5 ∆E48.1 ∆E37.1 ∆E76.8 ∆E42.6 ∆E43.6 ∆E92.9 ∆E70.6 ∆E52 ∆E37 ∆E24 ∆E13.5 ∆EColorChecker Honor MagicPad 2: 46.88 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 92.93 ∆E
Honor MagicPad 2Honor MagicPad 2
配件和保修 - 需要电源适配器？附带的 100 瓦电源适配器MagicPad 2 随附 USB-C 连接线、快速入门指南和保修信息。在英国网站上,Honor 还允许用户免费添加 100 瓦电源适配器和耳塞。
如果您打算在平板电脑上书写和绘画，您可以在Honor 网上商店找到合适的配件。.可用的配件包括Honor Magic Pen(80 英镑）和智能蓝牙键盘（76 英镑）。(£76).
Honor MagicPad 2 的保修期为 24 个月。
输入设备和操作 - 可购买触控笔和键盘Honor 但 OLED 面板对输入的响应非常迅速和精确。平板电脑上为数不多的实体按键（电源键和音量摇杆）虽然有些松动，但按压点非常清晰。
制造商还提供了 Magic Pencil 3 和智能蓝牙键盘供我们测试。进行测试。触控笔支持 4096 级压力，通过磁力吸附在平板电脑顶部。充电时间为 45 分钟，一次充电可持续使用 10 个小时。
智能蓝牙键盘既是一个盖子，也是一个键盘。当打开键盘时，它有一个 60 度的固定开启角度，平板电脑会被磁铁牢牢吸住。按键高 1.6 毫米，提供舒适的键入体验。键盘不支持背光或触摸板。将键盘翻转到背面，使其隐藏在平板电脑下面，可自动锁定按键，防止不必要的输入。
MagicPad 2 没有配备指纹识别器。自拍摄像头可用于 2D 人脸识别，只要显示屏足够亮，即使在黑暗中也能正常工作。平板电脑最多可设置识别 5 张人脸。
基座键盘和触控笔的总价为 160 英镑。
触控笔自动连接到平板电脑顶部
键盘将平板电脑撑起 60 度横向模式键盘
纵向模式键盘
显示屏 - 3K OLED 面板，144 Hz子像素MagicPad 2 的绝对亮点之一是其明亮而精确的 3K 显示屏。OLED 面板的分辨率为 3000 x 1920 像素，像素密度高达 290 PPI。此外，显示屏的刷新率高达 144 Hz，平板电脑可根据显示内容动态调整刷新率。此外，它还可以设置为 60、90 或 144 Hz。MagicPad 2 支持 HDR10、HDR 10+ 和 HLG。
在纯白背景下，显示屏的平均亮度为 650 cd/m²。在较小的图像部分（APL18）上进行测量时，结果与此类似。在显示 HDR 内容时，OLED 面板的亮度增加到 1503 cd/m²，接近制造商报告的 1600 nits。如果关闭亮度传感器，显示屏的最高亮度可设置为 601 cd/m²，最低亮度为 2.26 cd/m²。
在我们测量的所有亮度水平下，OLED 面板都会以 90 Hz 的低频闪烁。这对敏感用户来说可能是个问题。不过，这款平板电脑还具有 4320 Hz 的特殊 PWM 调光模式，我们的测量结果非常接近（4166 Hz）。
640cd/m²636cd/m²637cd/m²650cd/m²645cd/m²638cd/m²674cd/m²669cd/m²659cd/m²
Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 3Maximum: 674 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 649.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.26 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 94 %Center on Battery: 645 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.3 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}98.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)Gamma: 2.25CCT: 6658 K
Honor MagicPad 2OLED, 3000x1920, 12.3"Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022Mini-LED, 2732x2048, 12.9"Lenovo Tab P12 PaperLTPS, 2944x1840, 12.7"Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+AMOLED, 2800x1752, 12.4"Xiaomi Pad 6S ProIPS, 3048x2032, 12.4"Screen-22%-100%-51%-44%Brightness middle (cd/m²)645611 -5%148 -77%574 -11%867 34%Brightness (cd/m²)650605 -7%139 -79%551 -15%810 25%Brightness Distribution (%)9492 -2%90 -4%89 -5%87 -7%Black Level * (cd/m²)0.30.58Colorchecker dE 2000 *1.31.4 -8%3.59 -176%2.01 -55%2 -54%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *2.13.3 -57%5.52 -163%4.93 -135%5.5 -162%Greyscale dE 2000 *1.52.3 -53%3 -100%2.8 -87%3 -100%Gamma2.25 98%2.22 99%2.243 98%2.066 106%2.29 96%CCT6658 98%6930 94%7115 91%6566 99%6957 93%Contrast (:1)4931495* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 90 HzAmplitude: 18.02 %Secondary Frequency: 4166 HzThe display backlight flickers at 90 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .
The frequency of 90 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8156 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
分钟
25%
50%
75%
100%使用固定变焦和各种亮度设置进行的一系列测量（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来非常平缓，但这是缩放造成的。最小亮度下的振幅放大图可在信息框中查看）。
凭借 OLED 面板，MagicPad 2 不仅在分辨率和亮度上与 iPad Pro 12.9 等竞争对手不相上下 Apple iPad Pro 12.9和 三星Galaxy Tab S9+测试表明，MagicPad 2 的画质也丝毫不逊色于它们。如果将显示设置中的色彩模式设为 "正常"，色温设为 "标准"，MagicPad 2 的色彩准确度和白平衡都非常理想。
色彩精度（色彩模式正常、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩模式正常、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（色彩模式正常，色温标准，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
饱和度（色彩模式正常、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White1.16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.583 ms rise↘ 0.577 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey8.84 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.999 ms rise↘ 7.844 ms fallThe screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).
MagicPad 2 适合在户外使用，不过在阳光充足的日子里，增加的显示屏亮度可能不足以让用户读取显示内容。不过，在阴凉处，视角稳定的 OLED 面板始终易于阅读。
室外使用
室外使用视角性能 - 配备骁龙 8s 第 3 代处理器的 MagicPad 2配备 骁龙 8s 第 3 代处理器Honor MagicPad 2 是目前速度最快的平板电脑之一，与 小米 Pad 6S Pro(骁龙 8 代 2).三星 三星Galaxy Tab S9+的速度还是稍快一些，因为其主频更高 骁龙 8 代 2Galaxy.
Geekbench 6.5 | Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | AImark | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | Geekbench AI Geekbench 6.5
Multi-CoreSamsung Galaxy Tab S9+
5652 Points +9%Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
5176 Points 0%Honor MagicPad 2
5166 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4602 - 5284, n=8)
4966 Points -4%Average of class Tablet (848 - 16544, n=101, last 2 years)
4592 Points -11%Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
2408 Points -53% Single-CoreSamsung Galaxy Tab S9+
2107 Points +6%Honor MagicPad 2
1986 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (1821 - 2012, n=8)
1934 Points -3%Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
1924 Points -3%Average of class Tablet (185 - 4128, n=101, last 2 years)
1431 Points -28%Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
964 Points -51%Geekbench 5.5
Single-CoreApple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
1890 Points +31%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
1566 Points +8%Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
1477 Points +2%Honor MagicPad 2
1447 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (1329 - 1498, n=8)
1440 Points 0%Average of class Tablet (103 - 2286, n=69, last 2 years)
894 Points -38%Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
757 Points -48% Multi-CoreApple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
8524 Points +91%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
5198 Points +17%Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
4548 Points +2%Honor MagicPad 2
4460 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (3980 - 4746, n=8)
4341 Points -3%Average of class Tablet (303 - 10522, n=69, last 2 years)
3421 Points -23%Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
2025 Points -55%Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
1516127 Points +6%Honor MagicPad 2
1432569 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (1142944 - 1553057, n=7)
1419964 Points -1%Average of class Tablet (164396 - 3475590, n=73, last 2 years)
1143367 Points -20%Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
503958 Points -65%PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Honor MagicPad 2
17329 Points Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
17267 Points 0%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (15547 - 19083, n=8)
17134 Points -1%Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
16960 Points -2%Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
12789 Points -26%Average of class Tablet (3195 - 27428, n=84, last 2 years)
12141 Points -30%CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
1584 Points +37%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
1277 Points +11%Honor MagicPad 2
1155 Points Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
1153 Points 0%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (771 - 1155, n=7)
984 Points -15%Average of class Tablet (227 - 2155, n=58, last 2 years)
959 Points -17%Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
656 Points -43%BaseMark OS II
OverallHonor MagicPad 2
9147 Points Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
8886 Points -3%Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
8483 Points -7%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (5685 - 9147, n=8)
7825 Points -14%Average of class Tablet (195 - 13159, n=67, last 2 years)
5769 Points -37%Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
3965 Points -57%Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
Points -100% SystemSamsung Galaxy Tab S9+
13730 Points +4%Honor MagicPad 2
13141 Points Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
12668 Points -4%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (9875 - 13391, n=8)
11627 Points -12%Average of class Tablet (904 - 18343, n=67, last 2 years)
8960 Points -32%Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
6734 Points -49% MemoryHonor MagicPad 2
10977 Points Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
10049 Points -8%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
8890 Points -19%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (5456 - 12938, n=8)
8388 Points -24%Average of class Tablet (401 - 17963, n=67, last 2 years)
6800 Points -38%Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
5328 Points -51% GraphicsSamsung Galaxy Tab S9+
31688 Points +24%Honor MagicPad 2
25642 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (8020 - 29006, n=8)
23598 Points -8%Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
23041 Points -10%Average of class Tablet (88 - 57192, n=67, last 2 years)
15445 Points -40%Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
5160 Points -80% WebHonor MagicPad 2
1893 Points Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
1766 Points -7%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (1496 - 1928, n=8)
1736 Points -8%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
1612 Points -15%Average of class Tablet (10 - 2370, n=67, last 2 years)
1502 Points -21%Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
1335 Points -29%AImark - Score v3.x
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
156427 Points +12607%Average of class Tablet (138 - 55794, n=57, last 2 years)
5710 Points +364%Honor MagicPad 2
1231 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (946 - 1321, n=8)
1152 Points -6%Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
1118 Points -9%Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
457 Points -63%UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet (2597 - 76852, n=66, last 2 years)
16379 Points +18%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
16134 Points +16%Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
14961 Points +8%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (13576 - 15572, n=7)
14474 Points +4%Honor MagicPad 2
13900 Points Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
5266 Points -62%Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1Honor MagicPad 2
1065 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (407 - 1065, n=2)
736 Points -31%Average of class Tablet (243 - 1243, n=8, last 2 years)
705 Points -34% Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1Average of class Tablet (227 - 5204, n=8, last 2 years)
1683 Points +72%Honor MagicPad 2
981 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (399 - 981, n=2)
690 Points -30% Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1Average of class Tablet (508 - 4998, n=8, last 2 years)
2014 Points +19%Honor MagicPad 2
1693 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (903 - 1693, n=2)
1298 Points -23%Legend
Honor MagicPad 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 735, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU, 128 GB NVMe Lenovo Tab P12 Paper MediaTek Dimensity 7050, ARM Mali-G68 MP4, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 Average of class Tablet
MagicPad 2 的图形处理性能强劲，这要归功于 Adreno 735图形处理器。这再次使这款平板电脑在图形基准测试中名列前茅，尽管在 CPU 基准测试中并不那么轻松。除了 Apple iPad Pro 12.9和 三星Galaxy Tab S9+之外，它还落后于 小米 Pad 6S Pro.
不过，GPU 性能还是非常不错的，甚至可以处理图形要求较高的游戏，正如 GFXBench 的阿兹台克废墟测试所模拟的那样。在这里，平板电脑的帧速率总是远远超过 30 FPS（4K 基准除外）。在 GFXBench On Screen 测试中，Honor ，帧速率降至 60 FPS。
3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Steel Nomad Light Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
6909 Points +115%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3684 Points +14%Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3218 Points Xiaomi Pad 6S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3088 Points -4%Lenovo Tab P12 PaperMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
616 Points -81%3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
6919 Points +110%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3710 Points +12%Xiaomi Pad 6S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3421 Points +4%Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3301 Points Lenovo Tab P12 PaperMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
623 Points -81%3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
25317 Points +95%Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12985 Points Xiaomi Pad 6S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12952 Points 0%Lenovo Tab P12 PaperMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2236 Points -83%3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5623 Points +3%Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5458 Points Xiaomi Pad 6S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4887 Points -10%3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5630 Points +3%Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5468 Points Xiaomi Pad 6S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4876 Points -11%3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1090 Points Lenovo Tab P12 PaperMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
237 Points -78%3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1071 Points Lenovo Tab P12 PaperMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
235 Points -78%3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13954 Points Xiaomi Pad 6S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13009 Points -7%Lenovo Tab P12 PaperMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4308 Points -69%3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21647 Points Xiaomi Pad 6S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20808 Points -4%Lenovo Tab P12 PaperMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4314 Points -80%3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6219 Points Xiaomi Pad 6S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5627 Points -10%Lenovo Tab P12 PaperMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4289 Points -31%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 6S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
144 fps +140%Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
120 fps +100%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps Lenovo Tab P12 PaperMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
51 fps -15%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
873 fps +68%Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
520 fps Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
493 fps -5%Xiaomi Pad 6S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
397 fps -24%Lenovo Tab P12 PaperMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
100 fps -81%GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
120 fps +100%Xiaomi Pad 6S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps +98%Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps Lenovo Tab P12 PaperMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps -50%GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
494 fps +86%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
321 fps +21%Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
265 fps Xiaomi Pad 6S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
249 fps -6%Lenovo Tab P12 PaperMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
65 fps -75%GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
115 fps +95%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps +78%Xiaomi Pad 6S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps +17%Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps Lenovo Tab P12 PaperMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -71%GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
340 fps +70%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
226 fps +13%Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
200 fps Xiaomi Pad 6S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
181 fps -9%Lenovo Tab P12 PaperMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
43 fps -78%GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
89 fps +112%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
64 fps +52%Xiaomi Pad 6S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
42 fps 0%Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps Lenovo Tab P12 PaperMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps -76%GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
214 fps +95%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
132 fps +20%Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
110 fps Xiaomi Pad 6S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
106 fps -4%Lenovo Tab P12 PaperMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps -76%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
70 fps +100%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51 fps +46%Xiaomi Pad 6S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35 fps 0%Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps Lenovo Tab P12 PaperMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.9 fps -80%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
90 fps +64%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
64 fps +16%Xiaomi Pad 6S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56 fps +2%Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
55 fps Lenovo Tab P12 PaperMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps -80%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
89 fps +68%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78 fps +47%Xiaomi Pad 6S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56 fps +6%Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps Lenovo Tab P12 PaperMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps -77%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
241 fps +67%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
159 fps +10%Xiaomi Pad 6S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
146 fps +1%Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps Lenovo Tab P12 PaperMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -80%GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
48 fps +100%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
29 fps +21%Xiaomi Pad 6S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
26 fps +8%Honor MagicPad 2Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
24 fps Lenovo Tab P12 PaperMali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4.7 fps -80%
MagicPad 2 在网上冲浪时也同样出色。网站加载和显示速度很快，但在浏览器基准测试中，这款平板电脑只能排在中间位置。
Jetstream 2 | WebXPRT 4 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
225.315 Points +68%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ (Chrome 117)
196.271 Points +46%Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)
176.366 Points +31%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (59.7 - 235, n=8)
160.9 Points +20%Average of class Tablet (22.3 - 395, n=71, last 2 years)
146.1 Points +9%Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
134.356 Points Lenovo Tab P12 Paper (Chrome 126)
108.8 Points -19%WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
227 Points +46%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ (Chrome 117)
187 Points +21%Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)
167 Points +8%Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
155 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (61 - 185, n=8)
146.1 Points -6%Average of class Tablet (26 - 376, n=75, last 2 years)
133.5 Points -14%Lenovo Tab P12 Paper (Chrome 126)
107 Points -31%Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
376 runs/min +91%Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)
225 runs/min +14%Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
197 runs/min Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ (Chrome 117)
195 runs/min -1%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (65.9 - 256, n=7)
192.6 runs/min -2%Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 790, n=60, last 2 years)
186 runs/min -6%Lenovo Tab P12 Paper (Chrome 126)
99.8 runs/min -49%Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 49.1, n=61, last 2 years)
14.2 runs/min +19%Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)
12.2 runs/min +3%Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
11.9 runs/min Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (3.54 - 15, n=8)
10.8 runs/min -9%Lenovo Tab P12 Paper (Chrome 126)
6.37 runs/min -46%Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
74614 Points +78%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ (Chrome 117)
64715 Points +54%Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)
64638 Points +54%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (28536 - 66369, n=8)
50134 Points +19%Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
42032 Points Average of class Tablet (763 - 138481, n=102, last 2 years)
40662 Points -3%Lenovo Tab P12 Paper (Chrome 126)
34656 Points -18%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (243 - 27101, n=84, last 2 years)
2662 ms * -216%Lenovo Tab P12 Paper (Chrome 126)
1263.6 ms * -50%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (603 - 1456, n=8)
851 ms * -1%Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
842.2 ms * Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ (Chrome 117)
635.1 ms * +25%Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)
602 ms * +29%Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
450.9 ms * +46%* ... smaller is better
Honor 没有提供有关平板电脑存储设备的任何信息。从 Androbench 中达到的传输速率来看，可能是 UFS 3.1 存储设备，它可以缩短加载时间并快速启动应用程序。
Honor MagicPad 2Lenovo Tab P12 PaperSamsung Galaxy Tab S9+Xiaomi Pad 6S ProAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class TabletAndroBench 3-5-46%22%46%-20%-28% Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)2025.54894.3 -56%3413.8 69%3465.72 71%1757 ?(950 - 3497, n=114) -13%1663 ?(126.9 - 4093, n=89, last 2 years) -18% Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)2003.53722.1 -64%2528.2 26%3154.3 57%1204 ?(166.8 - 2674, n=114) -40%1216 ?(80.4 - 3773, n=89, last 2 years) -39% Random Read 4KB (MB/s)298.27237.4 -20%450.3 51%381.97 28%287 ?(173.5 - 543, n=114) -4%236 ?(20.1 - 475, n=89, last 2 years) -21% Random Write 4KB (MB/s)401.95225.7 -44%161.3 -60%510.95 27%318 ?(62.6 - 544, n=115) -21%268 ?(9.1 - 989, n=89, last 2 years) -33%
游戏 - 保证游戏流畅MagicPad 2 上的游戏显示总是很流畅，即使是像《源氏冲击》这样对图形要求很高的游戏，也能以最高细节进行显示。
我们的测试工具Gamebench在《源氏冲击》的整个游戏过程中，我们测得的帧速率始终保持在 60 FPS。理论上，平板电脑可以提供更高的 FPS 率，但这是不允许的。第二款测试游戏《PUBG Mobile》也是如此，它在 MagicPad 2 的最高设置（超高清）下运行流畅，但每秒帧数被限制在 40 帧。
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
Honor MagicPad 2; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 5.0.0_26041933_26161852: Ø59.9 (55-61) Honor MagicPad 2; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 5.0.0_26041933_26161852: Ø59.5 (54-61) Honor MagicPad 2; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.4.0: Ø60.1 (59-61) Honor MagicPad 2; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 3.4.0: Ø39.8 (39-41)
排放 - 强大的环绕声温度MagicPad 2 在运行时几乎不会发热。在进行了一个小时的 Burnout Benchmark 压力测试后，我们测得平板电脑表面的最高温度仅为 39.4 °C。这意味着，即使在持续负载的情况下，12.3 英寸设备的触感也很舒适。
3DMark 压力测试场景用于评估平板电脑在负载情况下对 SoC 性能的节流程度。即使激活性能模式，MagicPad 2 的性能下降仍然很明显，所有压力测试场景下的平均性能下降幅度仅约为 10%。如果平板电脑使用了手刹，那么在日常使用中你应该不会注意到它。
Max. LoadIdle
37.7 °C38 °C31.2 °C 30.7 °C32.1 °C29.7 °C 28.3 °C29.8 °C30.2 °C
Maximum: 38 °CAverage: 32 °C
32.3 °C37.1 °C39.4 °C30.3 °C32.7 °C30.2 °C28.5 °C29.4 °C28.8 °C
Maximum: 39.4 °CAverage: 32.1 °C Power Supply (max.) 29.7 °C | Room Temperature 20.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle
27.1 °C28.7 °C29.1 °C 26.8 °C28.5 °C28.7 °C 27.9 °C29.1 °C29.7 °C
Maximum: 29.7 °CAverage: 28.4 °C
27.9 °C27.9 °C27.4 °C27.5 °C28.2 °C27.1 °C28.5 °C28.4 °C28.1 °C
Maximum: 28.5 °CAverage: 27.9 °C Power Supply (max.) 26.2 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø64.5 (53.4-72.6) Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø97.9 (82.8-119) Lenovo Tab P12 Paper Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13 (12.9-13) Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø68.1 (60.6-78.8) Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø63.9 (63.3-68.9) Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø18.1 (17.6-19.7) Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø29.8 (27.1-41.5) Lenovo Tab P12 Paper Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø3.74 (3.73-3.75) Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø22.2 (20.5-23.4) Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø18 (17.9-19.5) Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø71.7 (69.5-77.2) Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø124.5 (113.6-152.4) Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø16.7 (16.4-17.5) Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø18.3 (18.2-18.3) Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø14 (14-14) Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø16.7 (16.4-17.5) Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø7.85 (7.73-8.06) Lenovo Tab P12 Paper Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø1.779 (1.765-1.795) Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø7.85 (7.68-8.09)
3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress TestLenovo Tab P12 Paper
99.5 (3.73min - 3.75max) % +11%Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
91.3 (17.9min - 19.5max) % +2%Honor MagicPad 2
89.3 (17.6min - 19.7max) % Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
87.4 (20.5min - 23.4max) % -2%Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
65.1 (27.1min - 41.5max) % -27% Wild Life Stress Test StabilityLenovo Tab P12 Paper
99.5 (12.9min - 13max) % +35%Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
91.9 (63.3min - 68.9max) % +25%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
76.9 (60.6min - 78.8max) % +4%Honor MagicPad 2
73.6 (53.4min - 72.6max) % Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
69.6 (82.8min - 119max) % -5% Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test StabilityHonor MagicPad 2
90 (69.5min - 77.2max) % Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
74.6 (113.6min - 152.4max) % -17% Solar Bay Stress Test StabilitySamsung Galaxy Tab S9+
99.8 (18.2min - 18.3max) % +7%Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
99.8 (14min - 14max) % +7%Honor MagicPad 2
93.7 (16.4min - 17.5max) % Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test StabilityHonor MagicPad 2
93.5 (16.4min - 17.5max) % Steel Nomad Light Stress Test StabilityLenovo Tab P12 Paper
98.3 (1.765min - 1.795max) % +3%Honor MagicPad 2
95.9 (7.73min - 8.06max) % Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Stress Test StabilityHonor MagicPad 2
94.9 (7.68min - 8.09max) % Legend
Honor MagicPad 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 735, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU, 128 GB NVMe Lenovo Tab P12 Paper MediaTek Dimensity 7050, ARM Mali-G68 MP4, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
发言人四个扬声器格栅下面共有八个扬声器。这使得纤薄的 MagicPad 2 能够产生均衡且令人惊讶的音量，包括对平板电脑而言相当不错的低音。用户可以在音频设置中切换立体声和空间音频，后者会让声音显得更加洪亮，有时甚至过于响亮。即使在最大音量下，扬声器也不会使音频失真。
外部音频设备可通过 USB-C 或蓝牙 5.3 连接。MagicPad 2 仅支持有限的蓝牙编解码器：SBC、AAC、LDAC、aptX 和 aptX HD。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Honor MagicPad 2 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.3 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.1% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (10.8% difference to median)Compared to same class» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 87% worse» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%Compared to all devices tested» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.6% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (8.8% difference to median)Compared to same class» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%Compared to all devices tested» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理 - 充电时间少于 2 小时能源消耗MagicPad 2 在负载情况下非常省电，最大耗电量为 11.6 瓦，比同类产品高效得多。这款平板电脑在闲置时也表现出色，但不得不承认输给了 三星Galaxy Tab S9+在这种情况下，三星 Tab S9+ 的能效更高。
MagicPad 2 的电池容量为 10,050 毫安时，充电功率高达 100 瓦。Honor 提供给我们的 66 瓦电源适配器可在 1:49 小时内为设备充电。1:24 小时后可充电 80%。
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.07 / 0.23 WattIdle 3.6 / 6.52 / 6.54 Watt
Load
10.63 / 11.57 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
Honor MagicPad 210050 mAhApple iPad Pro 12.9 202210702 mAhSamsung Galaxy Tab S9+10090 mAhXiaomi Pad 6S Pro10000 mAhPower Consumption-37%9%-5%Idle Minimum * (Watt)3.62.54 29%3.4 6%1.22 66%Idle Average * (Watt)6.5211.24 -72%3.6 45%7.18 -10%Idle Maximum * (Watt)6.5411.48 -76%3.9 40%8.22 -26%Load Average * (Watt)10.6312.97 -22%11.7 -10%13.63 -28%Load Maximum * (Watt)11.5716.6 -43%15.8 -37%14.56 -26%* ... smaller is better
Energy Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Honor MagicPad 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3: Ø7.19 (2.91-11.5) Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2: Ø9.71 (3.73-16.7) Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy: Ø8.88 (3.4-15.7)
Energy Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
Honor MagicPad 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.3 (11.2-11.4) Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø16.7 (16.5-16.7) Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø14.5 (11.7-15.8) Honor MagicPad 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø4.05 (3.68-4.28) Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø4.67 (4.29-4.84) Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.72 (3.61-3.96)
电池寿命MagicPad 2 的电池续航时间与竞争对手相似。10 小时的上网时间和略高于 14.5 小时的视频时间让Honor 与 iPad Pro 12.9 不相上下。 Apple iPad Pro 12.9.
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
24h 29min
WiFi Websurfing
10h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 40min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 52min
Honor MagicPad 210050 mAhApple iPad Pro 12.9 202210702 mAhLenovo Tab P12 Paper10200 mAhSamsung Galaxy Tab S9+10090 mAhXiaomi Pad 6S Pro10000 mAhBattery runtime1%14%-0%29%Reader / Idle (h)24.530.7 25%16.6 -32%42.8 75%H.264 (h)14.713.6 -7%11.6 -21%12.9 -12%WiFi v1.3 (h)10.111.2 11%11.5 14%9.7 -4%16 58%Load (h)3.92.9 -26%6.1 56%3.7 -5%
Pros+ 卓越性能
+ 144 Hz 的 OLED 面板
+ 明亮准确的 3K 显示屏
+ 日光下照片效果出色
+ 可使用键盘和触控笔进行扩展
+ 8 个扬声器提供环绕声
+ 良好的电池续航时间，66 瓦充电功率 Cons- 无 GPS
- 无 IP 等级
- 无蜂窝网络
- 更新时间短
- 无指纹识别器
- 只有一个存储选项
结论 -Honor MagicPad 2评论 Honor MagicPad 2。测试机由Honor Deutschland 提供。 Honor MagicPad 2 重量轻、机身薄、外观漂亮。但它的内部配置同样诱人，包括 3K 显示屏、强大的 SoC 性能和出色的扬声器。尤其是令人印象深刻的扬声器，使 MagicPad 2 成为电影和音乐爱好者的绝佳选择。
Honor MagicPad 2 拥有 12.3 英寸 OLED 显示屏、IMAX 增强认证和 8 个扬声器，是观看电影和连续剧的最佳选择。如果购买时附带键盘和触控笔，还可以进行几个小时的高效工作。
高分辨率 144-Hz OLED 显示屏和快速的 骁龙 8s 第 3 代使 MagicPad 2 成为 iPad Pro 12.9 的理想替代品。 Apple iPad Pro 12.9尤其是它可以与键盘和触控笔结合使用。Honor 的电池续航时间也与Apple 一样出色。两款平板电脑的续航时间几乎完全相同，足以满足一整天的高强度使用。
不过，我们对 MagicPad 2 也有一些不满意的地方。它的外壳不具备防尘防水功能，而且既不支持 GPS 也不支持手机连接。存储容量只有 256 GB，而且更新周期相对较短。用户只能使用 USB 2.0，而且不能输出图像。Honor 也没有加入 NFC 功能。不过，如果你主要是想在自家四面墙壁内使用多媒体和互联网应用程序，那么你可能不会受到这些缺陷的影响。
除了Honor MagicPad 2 之外，还有一款在价格和连接性方面与之相近，而且还可以配备键盘和触控笔的产品：小米 Pad 6S Pro 。或者，如果您愿意花更多的钱，Apple iPad Pro 12.9 或SamsungGalaxy Tab S9+ 会给您带来稍大的平板电脑、更好的摄像头以及图像输出和蜂窝网络。
价格和供应情况Honor MagicPad 2 在英国有售，售价 500 英镑，请访问 Honor 网站。.该设备目前尚未在美国上市。
请注意：我们更新了评级系统，这意味着第 8 版的结果不能与第 7 版进行比较。了解更多关于此更改的信息 这里.
Honor MagicPad 2
- 09/30/2024 v8
Manuel Masiero
Chassis82 / 98 → 84%
Keyboard70 / 80 → 88%
Pointing Device94%
Connectivity40 / 69 → 58%
Weight82 / 40-88 → 88%
Battery88%
Display90%
Games Performance39 / 65 → 60%
Application Performance71 / 92 → 77%
AI Performance42%
Temperature92%
Noise100%
Audio85 / 91 → 94%
Camera62 / 90 → 69%
Average65%
85%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 EmissionsNo DataMaterials25%Packaging80%Power Use93.6%Repairability40%Software Updates39% Total Sustainability Score: 46.3%
TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
Editor of the original article: Katherine Bodner - Translator - 318 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017contact me via: LinkedInTranslator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 647950 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:
Please share our article, every link counts!